HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Adams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 May 2000 12:15:50 +1030
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I must disagree with Pat Garrow's May 8 comments "Time lag works at
times. Often it does not."  Time lag by definition will **always** be
present in every archaeological assemblage.   The question is whether the
amount of time lag is significant. If it is only a few months, then in
most cases, who cares. But when it is years or decades, then I believe it
is important to understand. Durable goods last in their usage.
Manufacturing dates are not occupation dates.



William Hampton Adams, PhD
Lecturer, Director of Studies
Department of Archaeology
Flinders University
GPO 2100
Adelaide, SA  5050
AUSTRALIA

(+61 8) (08) 8201-5257
(+61 8) (08) 8201- 3845 fax

See the Flinders University website at:
http://wwwehlt.flinders.edu.au/archaeology/home.html

for information about historical archaeology:
http://wwwehlt.flinders.edu.au/wha/histarchinfo.html
http://wwwehlt.flinders.edu.au/wha/case/*studies.html

See the Australian Archaeology journal websites at:
http://felix.antiquity.arts.su.edu.au/AAA/Publications/index.html
http://felix.antiquity.arts.su.edu.au/AAA/Contributors/index.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2