HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Praetzellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 May 2000 11:08:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Folks,

Bill Adams has a history with the concept of artifact time lag that dates
back to his innovative work in Silcott in the mid-1970s. I haven't read his
recent article on the subject but I heartily agree with the sentiment in
his posting. We have taken to providing three indicators of site dates in
our reports: the terminus post quem and its basis (be that ceramic, glass,
or whatever), the mean ceramic date based on makers' marks not ware type,
and the estimated date of deposition, which is actually what we are trying
to get at.

It's shaping up to be a beautiful morning here in northern California.

Adrian Praetzellis
Sonoma State University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2