another minor ethical dilemna; i sometimes look at archaeology as being a means for providing concrete evidence of "facts" that might otherwise disappear down the "memory hole"
so: if you rename streets that were originally named in honour of slave-traders, are you covering up an uncomfortable truth? and should "penny lane" be an exception?
i think there's already a problem in the british heritage industry, with showing off all those palatial homes without talking enuf about just how they were paid for; as in, the slave-trade has already been whitewashed enuf...
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060710.wxnote10-4/BNStory/Entertainment/home