HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Denis Gojak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:54:30 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
No they don't, and you should be ashamed of yourselves.
----- Original Message -----
From: "geoff carver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: definition of an 'archaeologist' ?


i guess martin carver, present editor of antiquity & long-time professor of
archaeology in england, with his BA, isn't an archaeologist, then...
& i guess the peer-reviewed stuff i did (including the articles i was
commissioned to write) before i got conned into going back to "skool"
doesn't count, either...?

"John Dendy" <[log in to unmask]> schrieb:
> My experience has been that you're not an "Archeologist" without the MA.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2