HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Linda Derry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:02:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Isn't it interesting that most of the responses are about forts?

Linda Derry


-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marty
Pickands
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Reconstructions in Proximity to Original Sites

If we are talking also about reconstructions on original sites, Ft. Niagara,
Ft. Oswego, Ft. Stanwix, Ft. Ticonderoga and Ft. William Henry in New York
should go on the list. I believe Jamestown also has an off-site
reconstruction.
 
 
Marty Pickands
New York State Museum

ATOM RSS1 RSS2