HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Nassaney <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Aug 1995 14:25:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Linda,
 
I, too, share your concern with the way the state of Mississippi treats late
19th-early 20th century farmsteads or rural sites.  But does it come as any
surprise?  Who, do you suppose, occupied 90% of these sites?  Just a rhetorical
question to which I'm sure you know the answer.  This observation is related to
another broader question that one of my colleagues posed to me some time ago
when I remarked at how few institutions in the American South granted Ph.D.s in
anthropology.  Keep in mind that much of the pioneering work in method and
theory in the American Southeast was perfomed by Harvard, Michigan, American
Museum of Natural History, etc.
 
Just looking to rustle some feathers (and get us thinking about how present
social relations influence the practice of investigating the past).
 
Michael Nassaney
Western Michigan University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2