HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Pentney, Sandra" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:13:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Have you considered that it might be a hair receiver? 
Most of the hair receivers I have seen have been quite ornate, but I have seen a few examples along the way that were basic in form.

Sandra Pentney, MA, RPA
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
401 West A Street, Suite 775, San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: 619-696-0578 Ext: 4903|   Fax: 619-696-0578
[log in to unmask]   |   www.ene.com
         
Celebrating 40 Years of Green Solutions

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Anatolijs Venovcevs
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 12:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Redware Ring/Lid

Hello everyone,

I have been recently tasked in analyzing the artifacts from a small excavation adjacent to an 1815 Stone Gunpowder Magazine at the Fort York National Historic Site in Toronto, Ontario.  It produced an artifact that no one has yet been able to identify and I thought I might have better luck here.  It came from a layer dating roughly between 1820s/1830s to the early twentieth century and is associated with a plethora of domestic, military, and architectural artifacts.

At first glance it appears to have been a red earthenware lid - it contains the same lip you would expect to see on a lid and is roughly dome-shaped.  However, the lid lacks the top of the dome and so instead forms a ring and thus it wouldn't be an effective cover for anything.  While much of the glaze has been exfoliated, the little that remains is present both on the interior and exterior surfaces and on both the top and bottom, again suggesting that the object was made this way.  The object is 20 mm tall and 72 mm in diameter with the opening being 45 mm in diameter.

I have uploaded a few quick photographs to flickr.  They can explain the artifact better than I can.

Top - http://www.flickr.com/photos/45985978@N00/6106997042
Bottom - http://www.flickr.com/photos/45985978@N00/6107005608
Side 1 - http://www.flickr.com/photos/45985978@N00/6106459847
Side 2 - http://www.flickr.com/photos/45985978@N00/6107010178
Side 3 - http://www.flickr.com/photos/45985978@N00/6106466705

Any ideas would be appreciated.

Thank you,

Anatolijs Venovcevs
Research Archaeologist
Archaeological Services Inc.
Toronto, Ontario


-----------------------------------------------------
To report this message as spam, please FORWARD it to [log in to unmask]
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2