HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Daniel H. Weiskotten" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:51:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Isn't this really all about being consistent in what WE do, and providing a
key so what THEY did can be understood?  I grew up on metric, use
engineering, but report it all with notation of what it converts to in
English.  If arpents are mentioned in the ancient sources, I give
conversions so people today can grasp it.  If the builders uses cubits then
I figure out what the modern measure that I use to record converts to in
cubits.  Is that so difficult?  (not really)

Dan W.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2