Really? Did you have to resort to the word Teabaggers ? You sounded so
credible up until that point. If the other post has no relevance,  then
neither does your comment. Let's get back to discussions of historical
Archaeolgy please.


> If nothing else, this paranoid kind of revisionist history has no place on
> a site about historical archaeology.
> The Nazis actually liberalized gun laws (after the bans dictated by the
> Versailles Treaty).
> A better, contemporary example of "armed people" trying to defend
> themselves might be the Warsaw uprisings: first the Jewish ghetto
> uprising, then the city itself.
> Now try to imagine "armed" Teabaggers trying to "defend themselves"
> against drones and the 101st Airborne...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David
> Parkhill
>
> We could become "Schindler's America"--a nation where only the police and
> the military have guns, the people are disarmed and unable to defend
> themselves.
>


H. Jill McCormick, M.A.
Archaeologist
Professor of Anthropology
Arizona Western College