Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 1999 18:45:38 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Aaron Rabushka responds (in part):
>1) By using the work "anti-manifesto" you seem to indulging the kind of
>indirect communication that you deplore coming from Joyce and his ilk.
>There doesn't seem to be anything "anti-" about your manifesto.
I was writing in (very belated) response to Mr. Babbitt's article which, I
believe, was subtitled "A manifesto." If I'm wrong, I'm sure you'll tell me.
>3) No one needs your permission to write. Fortunately. Note that we
>remember fewer vituperators than we do composers. Eduard Hanslick comes
>to mind, and Mr. Pleasants (sp?)(whose first name escapes me) is always
>good for a few laughs.
That was Henry Pleasants. And reading Eduard Hanslick's criticisms today,
they seem to me the epitome of reasonable musical discussion. I guess
everyone gets their laughs in different ways.
I am looking forward in the next few minutes to listening to those
"swatches" on your web page. I will forebear to criticize, however,
unless I really like them.
I also agree with your point 4. There will always be disagreement about
just which types of music are "better" than Garth and Madonna.
Best wishes,
David Simmons
[log in to unmask]
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
|