Thanks to Kathleen R. O'Connell for her link to the Rosen article.
I do, however, have a few questions. If Mendelssohn did not in fact
"revive" back with his performance of the St. Matthew Passion, what *did*
he do? Why was Schumann's advice to study the WTC considered so radical?
Why did composers start making homage to Bach in a big way, all after
Mendelssohn's St. Matthew performance?
I realize that history gets revised every now and then, but does anyone
know the research on which Rosen's article was based?
Steve Schwartz