Len Fehskens wrote:
>Would someone care to explain to me what we gain by knowing that a
>given composer is or is not "great"?
Not a heck of a lot. It's difficult to have a worthy question-answer
discussion when a major word in the question, "great", can not be defined
with any degree of precision. I think it's just based on individual
preferences. A "consensus" can not prove greatness; it can only confer
greatness.
Perhaps what we most gain from this type of thread is some insight into the
person who considers a particular composer great. Whether that's something
you want to gain is another matter, but I think it has some benefits.
Don Satz
[log in to unmask]