CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Copper <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:09:12 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Pablo Massa wrote about those who write church music, and other issues too:

>Aren't they writing good music? (not the case of popular music sensations,
>who often can't write even their names).  Besides...what can be more
>challenging and engaging than writing music for a not-so-good church
>choir?.

Yes, I meant to sound more sympathetic than perhaps I did; I was trying to
express a paradox.

They/we are trying too hard to write that will be perceived by those who
publish music as "best for a not-so-good church choir" -- and then they/we
fail to be challenged and engaged, and fail to write music that is in fact
best for the purpose.  Not too long ago I received a large packet of music
by an unnamed publisher, full of the most pallid and uninteresting music I
could imagine, but -- here the paradox -- it seemed written by composers
with talent and imagination, who could have done so much better if they
knew that better could be wanted.

William Copper
composer of Lovelife Dances
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2