CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christopher Rosevear <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 Mar 2002 22:16:33 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Bruce Alan Wilson asked:

1. "would it be a good idea if there were [a unified music examination
system as in the UK]", and
2. "what group would be the best group to sponsor it?"

(1) All I can do is point at the benefits in the UK: (the ABRSM has a
lot more!)

a.  Because many school-children do these exams, there appears to be some
positive peer pressure towards doing music seriously (as opposed to the
insidious negative peer pressure shown to boys who do ballet).

b.  There is a long-term statistical link between working on music exams
and enhanced success in academic exams.

c.  The step level of the exams encourages pupils to move to the next grade
- to increase their musical skills.

d.  County and national orchestras and bands then have a standard
evaluation measure for "rough-cut" purposes; so you can have an ensemble
of Grade 4-6 where you know in advance that Royal Fireworks is feasible
but Firebird is not.

(2) Perhaps a combination exam board (Curtis, Julliard etc) would be the
way forward; or, indeed, a collaboration by the major US music schools with
the ABRSM!

CR

ATOM RSS1 RSS2