CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:31:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (149 lines)
      Ernest Bloch
        Macbeth

* Jean-Philippe Lafont (Macbeth)
* Markella Hatziano (Lady Macbeth)
* Jean-Philippe Marliere (Macduff)
* Jacque Trussel (Banquo)
* Marcel Vanaud (porter)
* Sophie Fournier (1st witch)
* Hanna Schaer (2nd witch)
* Ariane Stamboulides (3rd witch)

Orchestre Philharmonique de Montpellier Languedoc-Roussillon/Fredemann
Layer Musicales Actes Sud OMA34100 Total time: 73:39 + 68:43

Summary for the Busy Executive: At long last.  The first complete recording
of a first-rank opera.

Bloch's music is nothing if not dramatic.  However, a dramatic composer
doesn't necessarily make an opera composer, as the work of Brahms shows.
Bloch wrote his only opera, Macbeth, early on in his career.  From the
first, it's been a cult taste.  The play - the shortest mature tragedy
Shakespeare wrote - is ideally suited for opera: spectacle, witches,
murder, madness, struggles for power, and a swiftness in the movement
of events.  Bloch's setting has always had a cadre of distinguished
admirers.  Winton Dean liked it.  Andrew Porter thought it the best opera
based on a Shakespearean tragedy (and I don't think he forgot Otello).
It comes over as a weird cross between Boris Godunov and Tristan -
Mussorgskian drama mixed with Wagnerian leitmotiv - but it works.
That is, you don't think of leitmotiv or Mussorgsky while you listen.
Nevertheless, the opera's original production in Paris flopped, due to
rivalries within the cast, according to the sources I've read.  Apparently,
the production experience so turned off Bloch that he and his librettist,
Edmond Fleg, scrapped plans for a King Lear.

It turns out we very likely lost a masterpiece.  Fleg's libretto for
Macbeth, despite some odd rearrangements of Shakespeare's sequence of
scenes, nevertheless manages to keep a surprising amount of Shakespearean
turns of thought and word-play, usually without literal translation.  He
suggests the oddity (to the French) of Shakespeare's language without
breaking idiomatic French.  One example will make the point:

  Is this a dagger which I see before me,
  The handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee.
  I have thee not, and yet I see thee still.
  Art thou not, fatal vision, sensible
  To feeling as to sight? or art thou but
  A dagger of the mind, a false creation,
  Proceeding from the heat-oppressed brain? I see thee yet, in form as palpable
  As this which now I draw.
  Thou marshall'st me the way that I was going,
  And such an instrument I was to use.
  Mine eyes are made the fools o' th' other senses,
  Or else worth all the rest.

  Est-ce un poignard que je vois devant moi? La poignee
  tendue vers ma main? Viens! Que je te saisisse! Je ne
  puis te saisir, et pourtant, je te vois encore aussi net et
  palpable que celui-ci que je tire de sa gaine! Tu marches
  devant moi! Tu m'entraines la ou je vais! Non, c'est la
  fievre qui a fait de mes yeux les fous des autres sens!

He moves things along even more swiftly than the original play by cutting
down Shakespeare's five acts to three.  He has edited brilliantly, losing
nothing essential.  For example, the early scene with Duncan, Malcolm,
and the wounded messenger disappears, since much the same information
arrives in a subsequent scene with Ross, Angus, Banquo, and Macbeth.
Characters like Fleance never make it to the stage.  More important, he
also keeps Shakespeare's nightmare near-nihilism.  The witches turn out
to be much less frightening than Macbeth and his lady and the terror
they unleash.

The main rap - if you can call it that - against Bloch's music is that
it's a bit early, before the first "maturity" of the Jewish cycle, those
works crowned by Schelomo.  However, in my opinion, we're talking
"relative" here.  The opera all on its own grabs a listener, thrills to
the bone, and conveys an almost philosophical depth.  Immature Bloch
turns out to yield nothing to mature almost anybody else.

Bloch invests the story with music of tremendous power.  There's an
extensive argument of leitmotiv, so extensive in fact that Bloch urged
his publisher to publish a list of them as preface to the score.  It
didn't happen.  Now, a lot of operas use the Wagnerian innovation - not
so much the assignment of an identifying "tag" to a character or an idea
(which, after all, is at least as old as Mozart), but the carrying out
of a "shadow drama" in the orchestra, commenting on the stage action.
Bloch, however, seems to be one of the few composers to have noticed
that Wagner's little tags - as in the astonishing prelude to Das Rheingold
- have the ability to segue or even morph into one another.  Bloch not
only carries this out in Macbeth, he does so without resorting to Wagner's
idiom.  The language reminds me most of Mussorgsky's Boris Godunov,
perhaps because I've been listening to the Christoff-Cluytens recording
recently, but even here Bloch differs in that he offers fewer self-contained
set-pieces.  He weaves a continuous fabric (in the case of the first
act, roughly an hour long) in which characters break through to song-like
moments, without ever singing an actual song.  However, the music, vivid
and memorable, grips you from the get-go.  I don't miss an aria, because
the music gives me as much drama as the play.

To some extent, the seamlessness of the opera has worked against its
reception.  You can't have an album of aria highlights or orchestral
"bleeding chunks." Bloch attempted to provide the latter with a separate
publications of two orchestral interludes, probably the only music from
the opera that a listener has heard before.  I first encountered a Swiss
recording of these in the Seventies, and I reviewed an ASV disc (ASV
1019) earlier this year, the review available on www.classical.net.  As
powerful as these chunks are and as sharply as they whetted my appetite
to hear the opera whole, they become even stronger in their proper
dramatic context.

The weakest part of the opera, in my opinion, is the death of Macbeth
at the hands of Macduff, which comes and goes in an instant and with
no time for the death to register.  We see Macbeth in full battle fury,
blink our eyes, and then listen to the celebratory fanfares at the
tyrant's death.  However, the play shows the same flaw.  High points of
an opera filled with high points include not one, but two mad scenes -
one for Lady Macbeth and one for Macbeth himself, the latter very much
indebted to the mad scene in Boris.  Birnam Wood comes to Dunsinaine in
a choral sequence that marches inexorably.  Even more impressive are the
builds toward and the ends of the first two acts.  Bloch does a masterful
job of keeping the lid on, letting out a little tension at key points,
and allowing pressure to rebuild, so that when the climax comes, it is
both overwhelming and justified, in proportion to the accumulated
intensity.  Furthermore, the climax corresponds to the end of the acts
- a wise theater move in terms of audience psychology.  Thus, the climax
of the first act is not the death of Duncan, but the confusion among
Macbeth's guests after the discovery.  The end of the second act is
Macbeth's mad scene, as he works himself into a bloody rage, unleashing
a terror on the entire country.

The libretto emphasizes Macbeth and his wife and Macbeth vs. the witches.
Macduff and Malcolm are ruthlessly cut to the status of Lennox and Ross
in the original play.  We get not Shakespeare's blood feud, but the
sinner tempted and betrayed to hell.  Thus, much depends on the two
principal singers.  Lafont as Macbeth and Hatziano as his lady are
wonderful vocal actors, with a wide range of expression and great subtlety.
These performances practically define nuance without sacrificing power.
The orchestra, led by Fredemann Layer, gets through Bloch's complex score
with narrative zest.  It's a live performance, however, and not as
polished as a studio recording would be.  Nevertheless, Layer shows the
stature of the opera.  It's not merely worth the occasional revival; it
should be part of the active repertory of every major opera house.  I
won't hold my breath.  The choral work suffers most from mushy diction,
but fortunately the sentiments the chorus expresses mainly echo the
soloists.  The libretto and the notes are entirely in French.  Still,
this album will likely end up one of my year's best.

Steve Schwartz

ATOM RSS1 RSS2