CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:10:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Steven Schwartz <[log in to unmask]> writes:

>Furthermore, no composer that comes to mind - with the possible
>exception of Xenakis - demands that the hearer know music theory.

Can you expand on this a little? When I went to see the Ensemble
InterContemporain recently, they played a Xenakis piece (sorry, I forget
which one), and it seemed the least 'theory-needing' of all the pieces
performed.  The gestures (e.g., big glissandos) were very dramatic and
easily recognizable.  I felt more like I understood what was going on than
in the other pieces.

Dan Schmidt -> [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2