CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jocelyn Wang <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:11:09 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Donald Satz <[log in to unmask]> writes:

>I don't possess any hard standards concerning repeats; I'm more concerned
>with the overall quality of the performances. ...
>
>A superb performance without repeats beats a competent performance which
>observes all repeats, although I understand that some listeners could not
>consider a performance not observing the repeats to be superb or even
>acceptable.

A performance that does not observe all repeats as intended by the composer
cannot possibly be superb because it is patently contrary to what the
composer has made clear the piece should be.

-Jocelyn Wang
Culver Chamber Music Series

ATOM RSS1 RSS2