CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Deryk Barker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Nov 2003 15:42:58 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Steve Schwartz wrote:

>Stephen E. Bacher:
>
>>>I do agree.  I think we have to blame several trends and people.  The
>>>first is the educational system, which cut music programs as "frills"
>>>but kept the football team and the marching band.  Consequently, you
>>>have people with expensive educations who are nevertheless cultural
>>>ignorami.
>>
>>Similar to the way Latin is rarely taught in schools anymore, leading
>>to folks believing that the plural of "ignoramus" is "ignorami".:-)
>
>You mean, IT'S NOT?  I had Latin in public school through Cicero, but I
>admit I could have forgotten something.  Is it one of those "-us"/"-us"
>nouns?  Is it actually a first person plural present verb?

It certainly is, "we know nothing".  According to the COD the derivation
is *probably* from the play Ignoramus by one Ruggles, which satirised
the ignorance of lawyers.

The plural (and the COD specifies this) is, of course, ignoramuses.

Deryk Barker
dbarker @camosun.bc.ca

ATOM RSS1 RSS2