CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:52:43 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I applaud Janos Gereben's characterization of the sets as excessive,
a drawback to the enjoyment of the opera.

I would go farther and say the sets were an abomination, forcing me to
close my eyes for much of the opera in order to appreciate some of my
all-time favorite music.

The staging was based on Janacek's obsession for Kamila Stosslova,
certainly a valid tack, but Janacek's abiding love for nature was pretty
much ignored or subverted with the overall dreary sets and alteration
of stage directions, taking place entirely in a morphing/remorphing 1989
Ratskeller-like bar.  The closing scene, described in the program as a
walk into the sunset for the forester on a hill, looked instead like a
minature drunk walking down the inside of a barrel of a vented machine
gun toward a blue spot of no particular time of day.

Most people I talked to afterwards, however, liked the sets, thinking
them appropriate to the "modern music." When this opera becomes overplayed
enough that radical re-interpretations seem necessary, perhaps these
sets that insult Janacek's memory should be tried again.  In the meantime,
truly outdoorsy sets with easier-to-decipher animal costumes should be
used to educate audiences with Janacek's original vision, rather than
poison them with falsity as I believe these SF Opera sets do.

As far as I'm concerned, this version is Watership Down in a sewer,
despite fabulous singing.

Jeff Dunn
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2