BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:24:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> I think small cell beekeeping works so well because the cell size is a
> better approximation to the cell size in the core area of the
> broodnest.
>
> This is  the area the bees cluster on during the winter and where the
> first and last brood of the season are raised. I also think the downside
> associated with getting small cell foundation drawn out are caused by
> the very poor aproximation it provides for the rest of a natural
> broodnest with its larger sized cells.
<snip>
> But if bees naturally construct cells within the small cell size
> range, then much of the field management associated with small cell
> beekeeping which negates the effect of enlarged bees is not necessary.

What puzzles me is that the above seems -- unless I misunderstand -- to
suggest that a natural broodnest does pretty much what the small cell is
claimed to do, regardless of the bees chosen.

If this is so, then why the disppearance of feral colonies everywhere?

allen
A Beekeeper's Diary: http://www.honeybeeworld.com/diary/

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2