BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ames <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:14:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
As I mentioned before I see no reason honeybees will not be affected by this potential 
change. However, I could not find online the 7 classes of antibiotics referred to in the 
article so who knows..... 


NYT
July 14, 2009
Administration Seeks to Restrict Antibiotics in Livestock

By GARDINER HARRIS
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration announced Monday that it would seek to ban 
many routine uses of antibiotics in farm animals in hopes of reducing the spread of 
dangerous bacteria in humans.

In written testimony to the House Rules Committee, Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, principal 
deputy commissioner of food and drugs, said feeding antibiotics to healthy chickens, pigs 
and cattle — done to encourage rapid growth — should cease. And Dr. Sharfstein said 
farmers should no longer be able to use antibiotics in animals without the supervision of a 
veterinarian.

Both practices lead to the development of bacteria that are immune to many treatments, 
he said.

The hearing was held to discuss a measure proposed by Representative Louise M. 
Slaughter, Democrat of New York and chairwoman of the Rules Committee. It would ban 
seven classes of antibiotics important to human health from being used in animals, and 
would restrict other antibiotics to therapeutic and some preventive uses.

The legislation is supported by the American Medical Association, among other groups, 
but opposed by farm organizations like the National Pork Producers Council. The farm 
lobby’s opposition makes its passage unlikely, but advocates are hoping to include the 
measure in the legislation to revamp the health care system.

The Union of Concerned Scientists has estimated that as much as 70 percent of antibiotics 
used in the United States is given to healthy chickens, pigs and cattle to encourage their 
growth or to prevent illnesses.

The use of antibiotics for “purposes other than for the advancement of animal or human 
health should not be considered judicious use,” Dr. Sharfstein said in his written 
testimony. “Eliminating these uses will not compromise the safety of food.”

Much of Dr. Sharfstein’s testimony summarized information that has been widely 
accepted for years by medical groups. But many farm organizations dispute such claims.

“There are no good studies that show that some of these antibiotic-resistant diseases — 
and it seems like we’re seeing more of them — have any link to antibiotic use in food-
animal production,” said Dave Warner, a spokesman for the pork producers’ group.

Robert Martin, a senior officer at the Pew Environment Group, which has paid for an 
advertising campaign to support the measure, said the prospects for the measure’s 
passage were improving.

“Just the fact that Congresswoman Slaughter is having a hearing today is a huge step 
forward,” Mr. Martin said.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2