BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Darrell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 12 May 2013 07:11:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Begin forwarded message:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Here is an article that many people have been waiting for.  The  
> scientist featured in the article directly addresses the need for  
> treatment with data and a sound rationale for weighing the risks vs  
> benefits.  Many are saying that the issues are to be settled by  
> "science" rather than "emotions".  Here is the science.
>
>  http://www.producer.com/2013/05/no-yield-benefit-from- 
> neonicotinoids-scientist/
>
> In addition to this, there was the article from John Gavlowski -  
> field crop entomologist in Manitoba who has stated that the  
> increased yield in soy from honey bee pollination may outweigh the  
> benefit of some pesticide applications.
>
> It looks like IPM can be supported from either an apicultural or a  
> field crop interest.  And the experts are speaking on this.  This  
> is very positive, and more importantly makes the solution of IPM  
> tangible and relevant to all sides.
>


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2