BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:17:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
>
> >Ghislan,  we run into a lot of this kind of poor writing here in the US.
> The article is intended to outrage and stir up emotions.


Boy, and do we have emotions in California!  California has the most
restrictive pesticide regulations in the country, the best pesticide
application reporting, and the most active department of pesticide
regulation and public health tracking.  CDPR issues extensive annual
reports, including how it is phasing out organophosphates.

Ghislain, the pesticide manufacturers have gotten the message.  They
solicit the advice of beekeeping experts as to how to develop products that
won't kill bees.  Members of CDPR and EPA met with beekeepers this week re
issues in almonds.

Obviously, any manufacturer is going to defend the use of his product--that
is only fair.  To imply that they hold sway over EPA is an insult to our
regulators, a number of whom I've gotten to know.  I understand that it was
not you saying so, but it is important to differentiate between objective
writing and hyperbole and fear mongering.

All parties are working toward a common goal of fewer toxic chemicals in
our environment.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2