BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:16:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
The problem with the studies and people cited is that there is no 
positive link, only a bunch of "maybes" and "could' . Plus, most of us 
did discuss the articles when they appeared long ago. A lot of water has 
since gone under that bridge, including the links to IAPV. So I have a 
problem associating that with my question.

In any case, the original statement and question was-

       Statement- "Imidacloprid was registered on the basis of the Bayer 
research *you posted* which has largely been proven inaccurate now by 
the CCD team"

       Question- "How has the CCD team proved the data inaccurate? Love 
to hear from them."

I know the EPA would want the proven inaccurate Bayer data so they can 
do something about it. I hope the CCD team has provided them with it.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2