BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Oct 2009 06:50:52 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
> As you say, Allen, it boils down to cost vs benefit.  This is why MegaBee 
> has such a high hurdle to clear--since it is more costly, beekeepers 
> expect more benefit.

Much of the work on MegaBee and the additional expense is related to 
producing a liquid protein diet that did not settle out or spoil.   As far 
as I know, few actually use it as a liquid.  I would be interested in 
knowing if any here do so, and to what extent.

I suspect any superiority lies in its use as a liquid and as a dry feed or 
patty, Megabee has little, if anything, to offer that other feeds do not and 
it is expensive.

As I say often, the decision for most beekeepers comes down to cost, 
availability and freshness.  Freight can be a huge cost for those buying 
small quantities.

The question  of what is really in some of these proprietary feeds is also 
something to think about. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2