I think that was the whole idea behind those Standard Methods, that someone
bullyied a while back.
http://www.bibliothek-oechslin.ch/COLOSS/beebook/II/varroa


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:19 PM, allen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>>> I guess my question is whether all the various researchers use
> comparable methods for computing efficacy or is maybe we could be
> looking at apples and oranges when comparing the numbers published.
>
> Seems to me that this is a very important question.
>
> I'm addressing this to the professional scientists reading BEE-l.
>
> I know there are at least ten.  Will we get ten different answers?
>

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html