BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Cherubini <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:51:12 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Bob Harrison wrote:

> but I could find no research on the net to support the 
> "no residue claim' voiced by Paul. can you point to any research
> Paul where comb has been tested after fumigation with phostoxin?

Bob, I don't know of any research where comb has been 
tested after fumigation, but testing has been conducted on dozens 
of other foods including sugary foods like dried fruits. In  
these tests phosphine residues "will typically be non-detectable 
with adequate aeration, i.e., <0.004 ppm."  
http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/fumigant/aluminum-phosphide/PhosphinePest.html

Adequate aeration generally = 48 hours.

Paul Cherubini
El Dorado, Calif.

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2