BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carlos Aparicio <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Feb 1998 08:16:10 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
        It is widely supposed Latin America is the paradise of Burocracy and
this fact is an important cause of its misfortunes.
 
        America (North)seems competing hard in this field.
 
        Is hardly believable a oil  edible for babies is forbbiden for bees
for the only reason is dangerous for varroas health (their desvastating
parasit).
 
 
 
 
        Carlos Aparicio
 
 
 
At 07:44 PM 15/02/1998 -0800, Bill Truesdell wrote:
>Patrick,
>I agree, we should be talking registration. As far as oil needing it, I just
>checked my dormant oil spray that is used for red spider mites on trees, and
>it has EPA registration. And it is only oil, (and may be only mineral oil!)
>but is used as a pesticide so appears to need registration.
>Bill Truesdell
>Bath, ME
>
>Patrick McKown wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Been seeing a lot of mention of EPA 'approval'. Do you have
>> documentation that says the EPA approves. Would like your source. Far as
>> I was aware they only regististered or registered toxic substances. The
>> costs reflecting mostly testing for wether they should be registered as
>> 'general' or 'restricted'. What is the wisdom on getting a registration
>> for MO? I am not following this?
>>
>> Pat McKown
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2