BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"James D. Satterfield" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Feb 1995 16:33:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
My thanks to all of you who responded to my inreq.  Response was divided,
but the majority seemed to feel that the use of creosote was not a good
idea.  Perhaps there is a difference in the creosote formulation in USA
compared to other parts of the world???  This isn't clear to me.  I do
know that brand names or common names can sometimes differ widely.
 
I think I'll try the waterproofing formula suggested by William Lord.
I'm curious how beeswax would do as a substitute for paraffin.  Perhaps
it would make a sticky, pleasant-smelling mess!  Beekeeping encourages
experimentation.
 
Cordially yours,  Jim
 
 
-----------------------------------------------------
|  James D. Satterfield  |  [log in to unmask] |
|  P.O. Box 2243         |                          |
|  Decatur, GA 30031 USA |  Telephone 404 378-8917  |
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2