Scot Mc Pherson wrote:

>>>Are they all lying?
>>>      
>>>
>
>No certainly not, however there is some that sneaks in under the radar.
>And for the imitation/mixed stuff that is labeled "correctly",
>

Correct me if I am wrong, but I was merely commenting on whether or not 
honey, labeled as honey, contains honey as something other than a 
primary ingredient as you had asserted.  Nothing more.  I beleive you 
typed: "the cheap honey in the supermarket often contains honey as only 
as a primary and often even secondary ingredient."

I am saying  that this is not the case.  I looked when I was shoppong 
this AM.  Not a one of the bottles labeled honey had anything else in 
them.  Are you still insisting that "the cheap honey in the supermarket 
often contains honey as only as a primary and often even secondary 
ingredient." We are not talkiing about "honey bunches of O's" we are 
talking honey.

Am I a fan of the heated, highly filtered, bland honey I can find at 
publix?  No, mine's better - it tastes more interesting.  But each and 
every one of those bottles has a single ingredient - Honey.  Now would 
it not be disingenuous to suggest otherwise?

Keith

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---