BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Visel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Jun 1996 11:27:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
>Bee experts said that they can't predict how the                               
>   decline in the wild bee population will affect wild plants and the          
>   animals that eat them. But they guessed that in places such as New          
>   York and New Jersey, which may have no wild honeybees left, there           
>   aren't going to be too many wild berries this year.                         
                                                                                
#Is there anyone besides me who finds this (and other pronouncements            
of doom                                                                         
#in this article) to be excessively pessimistic, ignoring the possible          
#ameliorating effects of *native* bee species? There *is* a native bee          
#expert in Shimanuki's lab there in Beltsville, after all - so there is no      
#obvious excuse for them to neglect to mention this anywhere.                   
#Exasperated, as usual,                                                         
                                                                                
Lawrence Kellogg writes:                                                        
"  Yes, this does seem too pessimistic to me. I just attended a lecture on      
the forgotten pollinators and I'm reading a book by the same name. One          
of the major points that was made is that if *native* bees are given a          
chance they can do an excellent job of pollinating plants. In many cases        
the heavy reliance on honeybees has helped reduce native bee                    
populations by depriving them of the resources to survive. It appears as        
if honeybees may not be as benign as once thought. In a world of                
scarce resources they consume a lot of nectar that could support native         
bees. It was an interesting lecture and one that I am still contemplating.      
                                                                                
  Other discussion...?"                                                         
                                                                                
   I presume there will be some impact on pollination, but I can guess          
what the cost of producing a pound of honey will do.  I believe most            
beekeepers are in it for the honey.                                             
                                                                                
   I recently read that the Russians have been living with Varroa for 25        
years.  Perhaps, now that the curtain is down, we ought to go learn how         
they are dealing with it.  (Time to kiss and make up!)                          
                                                                                
Gerry Visel                                                                     

ATOM RSS1 RSS2