BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 07:53:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
> Queen, worker, and drone honey-bee (Apis mellifera) larvae of similar ages and genotypes were given, in their food, a constant dosage of water-suspended Bacillus
larvae spores, or water only, in 10 experimental replications. Pooled data from all replications showed that spore treatment resulted in about 93% mortality of female larvae reared as queens, 82% mortality of those reared as workers, and 68% mortality of the male (drone) larvae. 

> The results presented diverge from those presented by Woodrow (1942). Woodrow concluded, “Infection was produced in queen and drone larvae as readily as in worker larvae.” The food of drone larvae differs significantly from the food of the other two castes (see, e.g., Haydak, 1957). Such differences in diet may result in differences in resistance. Differing amounts of honey or pollen present in the food of the three castes may be the source of differential survival among castes. 

Comparative Mortality of Queen, Worker, and Drone Larvae
THOMAS E. RINDERER AND WALTER C. ROTHENBUHLER
JOURNAL OF INVERTEBRATE PATHOLOGY 13, 81-86 (1969)

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2