BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:23:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
--- Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
...while
> waiting for SMR to work its way into the mainstream,
> most would decide
> to wait.

You'll be waiting for a long time.  ;>)

The SMR bees do not exist.
The trait was explained by Ibrahim and Spivak as
hygienic behavior.

The belief was that the bees somehow had the   ability
to cause infertility of mites and suppressed mite
reproduction, hence the acronym SMR.  But research has
shown that it was the hygienic trait being expressed.

WARNING: do not believe this research just yet!

You will still have to wait for Bob, Jim & Co. to give
'valid research blessings' before accepting this, it
could be flawed and sloppy research.  ;>)

http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/Publications.htm?seq_no_115=178712

Joe Waggle ~ Derry, PA
Small Cell Beekeeping
‘Bees Gone Wild Apiaries'
http://www.biologicalbeekeeping.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Organicbeekeepers/



__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2