BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David L. Green" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:50:38 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In a message dated 8/10/00 6:15:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> In answer to Aaron Morris' question regarding bee toxicity of Anvil 10 + 10
>  ULV. The active ingredient , Sumithrin, is listed as highly toxic to bees
in
>  the Farm Chemical Handbook.

    This is a puzzlement for me. One applicator locally has switched to
Anvil, because bee protection directions are not on the label.  I wonder
about the history of the labeling process for this chemical, and will see if
I can find any further info.

    If there is bee toxicity there is an important reason for the pesticide
manufacturer to include the label directions, besides being good procedure --
bee-label directions tend to protect the manufacturer from liability, by
transferring responsibility to the applicator.

Dave Green     SC   USA
The Pollination Home Page:  http://pollinator.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2