> So in essence what your saying is that a couple of small scale experiments are right,  and guys who make a living at it are fools wasting money?  

No, that isn't what I was saying at all. What I was saying that there is a difference in the methods. One sets up a test where the results can be observed and the other just wings it. That's what I was saying, the way science approaches the question, so that the results have some value. In my field we routinely shred other people's work. Try not to take this stuff personally. 

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html