>>All this begs the question of why then do we get glowing reports of small 
>>cell working? I did have my own trial and it mirrors the research with 
>>dead bees. Small cell does not work.
>
> I've read about Dennis Murrel's positive experience with SC a couple of 
> years ago.  Seems regression was an important step in SC.  Not sure if any 
> of you guys bothered to do it...  www.bwrangler.com/sunr.htm  > I have no 
> experience with SC and the reason behind the need for regression escaped 
> me.  It was mentioned as a key step in the SC process for a successful 
> outcome.

I hope you'll excuse me, but the poor old Emperor really has no clothes.  I 
have followed all these paragons closely, and have to say that in the case 
of Lusbys, there is a huge AHB component and no evidence of commercial 
potential.  In the case of Dennis, I followed his site and even mirrored it, 
and what he says now that he did is not what I saw at the time.  Did I 
misunderstand?   I may have some backups around here somewhere.

Anyhow, sorry, folks.  Really sorry.  I know we  all need something to 
believe in.  I'm afraid, though, this is not it. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html