BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Tharle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:43:26 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Medhat

Were a number of Canola pollen's tested or just a single source?  At any 
given time there are over a 100 varieties licensed and there are 
definite differences in bloom, plant structure, etc between groups of 
them.   Some produce abundant nectar, while others seemingly don't; so 
I'm wondering if there could be differences in the pollen.

Dave Tharle
Ardmore, AB

On 2/11/2012 12:36 PM, Medhat Nasr wrote:
> In my lab we analyzed GMO canola pollen for protein, sugars and amino acids. They were similar to non GMO. The only issue in terms of nutrition is:
> 1. As bill mentioned us one pollen source. Bees are polyectic (likes various pollen sources).
> 2. The pollen flow comes only for few weeks (2-4 weeks).
> 3. Sprayinh round up kills all other weeds that can be alternatives food sources for bees at various tuime of the year.
>
> Research was done in northen Alberta by Dr. Winston's student and they showed some of these effects.
>
> Medhat
>

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2