BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lloyd Spear <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:56:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Coincidently, Jerry answered this question in the November issue of ABJ.
HFCS 55 is 87% sugar! The 55 is only the fructose content. The 'missing' 13%
is apparently water, but I don't know that for sure. However, I have heard
the 87% enough times over the years that I am reasonably certain it is
right.
 I think the calculations will show that at the 87% level HFCS is a 'lot'
less expensive than sugar (sucrose). That is the challenge these guys face.
At a moment's notice, all the HFCS customers will switch to sugar if it is
less expensive!
 In the same ABJ is a 'history' of HFCS in the US. Interesting reading.

--
Lloyd Spear
Owner Ross Rounds, Inc.
Manufacture of equipment for round comb honey sections,
Sundance Pollen Traps, and producer of Sundance custom labels.
Contact your dealer or www.RossRounds.com <http://www.RossRounds.com>

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2