BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 17:08:59 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>
> > In other words, have a preponderance
> of beekeepers in those areas been reporting a decline in
> honey crops and failure to thrive?  Especially since the
> widespread adoption of neonic treated seed beginning
> around 2004 - 2005?


Paul, that is exactly the question that I have been asking beekeepers all
over the country!  I am not seeing a strong correlation with the use of seed
treatments, but it is very difficult to get objective observations, since
the neonics are such an easy target, and make for good scapegoats.

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2