BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John & Christy Horton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:14:53 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
I have always assumed that, say,  a 10 day old queen cell in a hive with
queen cells that are younger would hatch out first and most likely tear down
the other cells. I have never observed it to be otherwise.
Since only a small percentage of my nucs that are recieving queen cells have
cells already started i could have overlooked  the impact.

I would like to hear more on this.

I have howevre definitely noticed a tendency to not build new queen cells if
one is already present.


Juanse, Brother Adams wrote the following:
"I have found that a queen which emerges in an incubator is never as good as
one who spends her first few hours in her normal environment.....So also a
queen which has been caged for any length of time is seldom, if ever as good
as one which has never been confined-the the extent of the injury depends on
the age and condition of the queen when she was confined."
From
"Beekeeping at Buckfast Abbey" page 89
by
Brother Adams

*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at:                       *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2