BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Hesbach <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:18:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>have you seen a study that tested for benefit of under supering on single brood chamber colonies with an excluder over
>the brood chamber?  Only then could you correctly assert that there is no research supporting bottom supering above single-broodnest hives


This study found no difference in supering positions. Not sure if it meets the exact conditions mentioned above but is really close.  

>Effects of top-versus bottom-supering on honey yield
>Jennifer Berry and Keith Delaplane  

>Abstract:
>Bottom-supering failed to achieve significantly higher honey yields than the less labor-intensive method of top-supering. The experiment was replicated >across three apiaries, and two nectar flows. 

Referenced in the Berry study was work by Sazbo. I couldn't get this one to read, but according to the reference, Sazbo's study did not find a difference. 

>A comparison of top and bottom supering on honey quantity and quality.  [1994] Szabo T.I. Sporns P. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2