BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Moroney <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Jan 1997 18:09:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
In article <<[log in to unmask]>,
John Volpe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some literature I have read recently suggests that workers, in their queen
> selection, will choose those larva most closely related to themselves (ie
> larvae that were fathered by drones produced from the home hive as opposed
> to those larvae fathered by drones from other hives). This presents two
> questions;
 
I read something similar but I interpreted what was said differently.
What I read is workers will choose larva fathered by the same drone that
fathered them over larva fathered by some other drone.  That is, favoring
sisters over half-sisters.  This drone does not have to come from the home
hive, and this strategy does not encourage inbreeding.
 
-Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2