BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 06:46:59 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/related
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , bee mite 2.JPG (61 kB) , bee mite pops.JPG (69 kB)
The concepts of monitoring pest population levels, and taking action as
such pest levels approach seasonally-adjusted treatment thresholds is
integral to integrated pest management, no matter whether we are speaking
of varroa or any other agricultural pest.

When brood is present in a hive, varroa increase is nearly always
exponential from Day 1--in non resistant bees, doubling about once a
month.  This is for the entire varroa population in the hive.  The illusion
of linear increase in the mite population occurs for two reasons: (1) all
exponential growth curves appear linear in the early stages, and (2) the
bee population in a colony builds along with the mite population for the
first part of the season, so the *infestation rate *(number of mites per
bee) does not change to any great degree so long as the colony is also
growing at the same rate as the mites.

The monitoring of the infestation rate of adult bees does not directly
reflect the total mite population in the hive, since a proportion of the
mites are typically hidden in the brood (about 50% for much of the
broodrearing season).  Natural mite fall more accurately reflects the total
mite load of the colony, but needs to be considered in the context of the
size of the colony, and the amount of brood emerging on that day (natural
mite fall is mostly correlated with daily adult bee emergence, and
typically varies greatly day to day).

The sudden increase in varroa level in late summer, observed when monitored
by the sampling of adult bees, gives the illusion that the varroa
infestation of the colony has suddenly begun to "go exponential."  What has
actually occurred is that the recruitment rate of bees tends to rapidly
drop off after the main flow, due to reduced broodrearing.  This results in
a greater infestation rate of the remaining brood, and a shift of the mite
population from out of the brood, and onto the adult bees, hence the
appearance of an "exponential explosion" of the mites.


​
Note how the mite infestation rate "explodes" in fall, despite the fact
that the total mite population of the hive
appears to have only increased relatively slightly.  This illusion is due
to the scale of the y axis.  Allow me to plot out the exact same data for
the mite population on a more illustrative scale below:


​This is exactly the same mite data, but plotted on a different scale. The
mite growth was exponential at first, but then limited by the reduction in
broodrearing by the colony after midsummer.

The other factor that can cause a sudden increase in the mite population is
immigration of mites from other collapsing hives, which typically occurs in
late summer and fall.  Robbing and drifting bees can suddenly increase the
mite population of surviving hives within flight range.

The proactive beekeeper will monitor mite levels throughout the season, and
apply seasonally-adjusted treatment thresholds to keep the mites at
acceptable levels.  It is far better for the bees to keep mite populations
from building, than it is to reduce them *after* they've built to damaging
levels.

Such seasonal treatment thresholds must take into account a number of
factors, such as the point in time of seasonal colony population buildup
and decline, the amount of brood present,  available windows for treatment
(often determined by whether honey supers are present), the method of
monitoring, and the expected curve for the mite population in the near
future (it declines when there is little broodrearing).

The most important concept to keep in mind is that it is not the mites that
kill the colony--it is epidemics of viruses vectored and triggered by a
high rate of mite infestation.  So long as the infestation rate of the
adult bees remains below about the 2% level (assuming complete recovery of
mites by your sampling method), viruses are seldom a serious issue.  As the
level approaches 5%, depending upon the individual colony, in-hive
epidemics of either DWV, one of the paralytic viruses, or Lake Sanai Virus
begin to occur.

Such virus epidemics, as well as the rate of recruitment of new bees via
broodrearing, are highly influenced by the protein intake of the colony, in
the form of pollen or pollen sub.

The proactive beekeeper understands pollen, bee, and mite population
dynamics, and manages his hives to prevent the *relative *population of the
vector (the mite infestation rate) from exceeding the threshold at which
viruses are likely to go epidemic.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2