BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"DAVE D. CAWLEY" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Jul 1995 20:43:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
> From: "D. Kall" <[log in to unmask]>
> If a reliable difference could be established it could lead from
> the fanciful bee-killing laser to a practical, field-test device.
> Imagine a portable lab chamber and a laptop to take measurements.
> Field bees are caught individually and inserted in the chamber.
> Based on acoustic signatures AHB are distinguished from regular bees.
> No need to do complicated and time consuming physiological
> investigations that are difficult/impossible to do in the field.
>
>
> So what does everyone think? Possible?
 
        I think it would significantly *increase* the time it takes
to check my bees if I had to corral each bee into a little "Cone
of Silence"(tm) to check it and somehow remember who has had their turn
and who hasn't. I think I'll stick with the I get close to the hive and
they attack me by the hundreds test...thanks anyway. 8-}
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave D. Cawley            |     The information on the Internet is only
University Of Scranton    |     interesting to people who are interested
Scranton, Pennsylvania    |     in it.
[log in to unmask]         |             -Scranton Tomorrow Spokeswoman
[log in to unmask]      |     refusing invitation to Internet Cafe's opening
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2