Barry Birkey wrote:
>
> Okay, I just have to stick my nose in now. It sure sounds like Duragilt is coming out on
> the junk pile from most everything that's being said in this thread. Is it just me or
> what? I've never used anything but Duragilt and can't say I share the problems that
> others are talking about! Sure, once in a great while you will get a piece of foundation
> that starts getting messed up from the beginning but that's due to a flow that's
> inadequate for supporting comb building in my experience. Once the foundation has
> been pulled out I've never had "bald" spots appear in the comb. Are all those who have
> had "bad" experiences with Duragilt telling us the "whole" story? Is it that the
> foundation is inferior or is it not being introduced properly? Is it a "bald" spot here and
> there or is it frame after frame of comb being cleared down to the plastic? Anyone else
> willing to stick their head out and admit to using Duragilt? :>)
>
> Happy with Duragilt in Illinois!
>
> -Barry
>
> --
> Barry Birkey
> West Chicago, Illinois  USA
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.birkey.com
 
        Hello Barry
        I have over 200 Med. Supers in my honey house that has Duragilt
in them and don't have much to say against it. I just got another 12.5
pound box to keep on hand.  It is also in all my hivebodies.
                                        Ken