BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Jul 2015 07:46:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> I suspect that the problem is related to the amount of seed dressing

Except that the amount of neonics in nectar is practically undetectable. 

> Overall, field studies show that neonicotinoid residues are extremely variable. Many found no detectable residues, and others found levels lower than 10 ppb. The rates used in recent laboratory based studies, therefore, appear not to be typical of concentrations in nectar and pollen. Rather than “field realistic”, they seem more representative of a “worst case” scenario. 

> Laboratory based studies show that neonicotinoid insecticides can have adverse sub-lethal effects on bees, but so far these effects have not been observed in the field.

Norman L Carreck & Francis L W Ratnieks (2014) The dose makes the poison: have "field realistic" rates of exposure of bees to neonicotinoid insecticides been overestimated in laboratory studies?, Journal of Apicultural Research, 53:5, 607-614, DOI: 10.3896/IBRA.1.53.5.08

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2