BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Cushman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:52:13 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hi Tim

 > there were about ten percent double
 > queens, but I saw no link to aggressive behaviour.

Is there a linkage between two queens and aggression in Scuts ?

I have experience of two queens (and occasionally 3), but in AMM this 
seems to be way that the colony uses two queens that each lay at a 
slower rate (sometimes one will take a rest for a few days) this 
behaviour wears out the queens at a slower rate and allows for a longer 
time to elapse between the need for out crossed matings (which may only 
occur infrequently, due to localised weather).

Certainly there is no aggression in workers due to two AMM queens, if 
anything the reverse is true, but I do not think that the docility is 
related to two queens either (unless it is a manifestion of higher 
levels of queen pheromone).


Regards & Best 73s, Dave Cushman, G8MZY
http://website.lineone.net/~dave.cushman or http://www.dave-cushman.net
Short FallBack M/c, Build 6.02/3.1 (stable)

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2