BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:59:37 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
--- Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Reply:
> Exactly. If you cannot address the problem like it
> occurs in the field, you cannot correct it in the
field later. You have to look at the whole picture to
correct many things in life, not sound bites or little
patchworks that have no bearing on the whole real
world of life.


I disagree and reiterate.  You test for one criteria
at a time, cell size and varroa effects.  When you get
the data for that, then you test and obtain the data
of cell size and chalk brood.  Then you further test
to see the effects of varroa and chalk brood combined
on celll size and see if that data has a positive
relationship with the combined data of the previous
two tests.  The scientific method requires the
utilization of only one variable at a time in proving
a hypothesis "Cell size directly affects the
tollerance of honey bees to varroa".

Mike in Alabama




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2