BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:35:08 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>Puzzlingly, the study does not explain why a long tongue would be any
disadvantage in working "shallow" flowers that do not necessarily require
longer tongues.  One would think that a longer tongue would always be
useful.

" we show that reduced flower abundance in bumble bee host-plants at the
landscape scale has accompanied recent warming".

Reduced flower abundance forces the long-tongued specialist to compete with
the short-tongued generalist?  Perhaps the tongue length is not now the
advantage that it was when there were more flowers that only the
long-tongued species could work?

Best wishes

Peter 
52°14'44.44"N, 1°50'35"W

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2