BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Dillon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:13:37 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Bob,
You mentioned in your comments on the evolution of the sting of  the honey bee,
that the sting of the worker caste is barbed and the sting of the Queen's is
not.
In fact, the sting of the Queen is barbed - but at much reduced level - but
barbs are present.
So, it may be asked:
Has the queen retained a  barb structure closer to the "original" construction
pattern, with workers developing more effective barbs later in the passage of
evolution, or,
has the queen lost the barbed pattern, which has been retained in worker bees?
Possibly, a primitive stage occurred where the sting was similar for both worker
and queen, with subsequent development of barbs in workers and "suppression" in
the queen!

Peter

ATOM RSS1 RSS2